Analogy and Update

Perhaps an analogy will help people understand how ridiculous the case against me was.

Imagine that the FBI searches two houses next to each other. House A has a security system with cameras that put timestamps on the video. House B has no security system or cameras, but during the search of House B, the FBI installs a security system with cameras and then fabricates video with timestamps mimicking House A’s using artificial intelligence.

A Prosecutor then uses the fake video from House B to indict a masked John Doe in the video with robbing House B. Prosecutor claims masked John Doe is a specific individual who lives in the neighborhood. The accused asks his experts to examine House B’s security system and video. Experts produce a report that says House A’s security system and cameras work fine. Accused tells his attorney “But I’m accused of robbing House B, how is House A relevant?” Attorney responds “Experts say security system and cameras are reliable — case closed —you should take a plea deal”.