bookmark_borderWhoop, There it is!

During the day on July 30, 2015 Joe Howard was e-mailing me trying to persuade me to allow him to enter into plea negotiations with POS Becker. I denied all his requests in writing (via e-mails) ordering him to prepare for trial. As my previous post today explained, his disobeying my order violates many ABA rules. Thus, that’s likely why he won’t produce them.

It’s in that context that you can understand this brief selection of e-mails provided by the NY Public Defender’s office. While reading the second page of the pdf, keep in mind Howard knows he did not have permission to negotiate and obtain the “Petition to Plead Guilty” under discussion. Damning, No?

July-30-2015

bookmark_borderI Knew It

I knew it but couldn’t prove it then (2015). See PDF:

I-knew-it

Shockingly, William Laubenheimer, died recently (RIP) so I can’t ask him to opine on the recent revelations. This is one instance where I think his demise was simple coincidence, thus the exception to my “rule” of not believing in coincidences. Regardless, with the limited information I had at the time (2015), I made a compelling argument that Ashely’s team was lying. As a consequence of Joe Howard’s refusal to comply with my e-mail demands, we can now conclude he was a part of Becker’s railroading conspiracy…

Let’s break it down. The NY Public defender’s office confirmed that I’m entitled to my case e-mails by complying with my request to turn them over (even though some e-mails appear to be missing, probably deleted on purpose — Whether that purpose was benevolent or nefarious will probably never be known).

Without knowing the exact mechanism of my railroading in 2015, the above pdf shows that I had a specific idea of what actually occurred when I declared that: “All these facts indicate that the visits never happened… or occurred inside a hidden iframe…”

When you google: “What ABA rules are violated when a defense attorney ignores his clients demand to prepare for trial and instead negotiates a conditional plea agreement?” Google will return a lengthly list of potential violations, thus explaining Joe Howard’s refusal to produce the requested e-mails. Especially since the chain of e-mails exchanged on July 30, 2015 prove he violated those ABA rules!

On September 4, 2025 I sent the Nebraska Counsel for Discipline a complaint about Howard’s failure to comply with my request for those incriminating e-mails. I await their reply…

bookmark_borderCode Explanation

I realize that most of my readers may not understand the code shown in the shills 2016 report. Here is a brief breakdown. Figure 3 shows that gallery.php loaded with a query string. As the link explains a query string is a part of a URL that contains data and parameters to be passed to a web server. So as you can see in Figure 3, gallery.php is loaded with a query string setting parameters “b” to “girls” “t” to “1481” and “u” to /girls/res/1481.html” (the percent sign and the number two represent the /).

Now look at Figure 4, you’ll see $request_uri = isset($_GET[‘u’]) that code falsified the request_uri displayed on Figure 12. Now look at columns “request_uri” and “request_headers” (that fills the rest of the figure”). You’ll see the Referers are the same page as the request_uri. That occurs because the request_uri is falsified by the query strings!

In other words they (the FBI) were also falsifying the actual referring page! (The referring page is the page your browser was on before the current page: request_uri). See how that’s a HUGE problem? Your previous page could have been anywhere. For example, say you’re on a legal website using TOR, that sight could send you to TB2 in a hidden iframe without your knowledge. Then the above code would scrub that information from the table and make it look like you reloaded the page from a link on that page, for Figure 3, 1481.html.

Bottom line, this code is proof of fraud and criminal fabrication of evidence. Also note that I’ve been pointing out that Tinyboard doesn’t have a visitors table since June 2015, so all the government’s NIT evidence was inadmissible from the boot. The Shills knew that and helped Becker conceal it. Thus, I WAS RAILROADED!

bookmark_borderConspiracy Confirmed

So, to my surprise, I received a large envelope on Friday September 12, 2025. This envelope contained the response to a letter I sent to the NY Public Defender’s Office On September 4, 2025 where I requested “all e-mails regarding [my case] between this office (e.g Steven Slawinski) and Joe Gross, Joe Howard, Gerry Grant, Ashley Podhradsky, Matt Miller, Josh Stroschein, Keith Becker & Michael Norris from April 2013 until December 2016.”

Not to my surprise, Joe Howard (my Nebraska Defense Counsel) has ignored a similar letter. Here are the relevant parts to give you context:

Beginning in May, the DOJ began releasing pages in response to my FOIA action. Some of those pages contain bombshell information never disclosed before. As you know, I refer to Ashley Podhradsky’s team as government shills; because, I knew that they were colluding with Becker to railroad me. Now, I finally have proof and that you were aware of this fact since June 2015.
As you can confirm from the attached pages, the shills were in direct contact with Becker, a non-expert, answering “questions posed by the FBI team” – WTF?
Anyway, as you know, direct communication is not allowed because Becker (or the FBI) could have (and apparently did) influence my experts to help railroad me. Peculiarly, their May 2015 communications with Becker were (intentionally?) omitted from the FOIA page dump. I eagerly await the Vaughn Index to see their justification for withholding them. I know they exist because the shills reference them in their misleading/false 2015 report – note that they totally impeached their 2015 report in 2016.
Regardless, since you clearly had the un-redacted version of the enclosed e-mails, I’d like to formally request that you send them to me (since they’re technically apart of my case file, so I’m entitled) and every other e-mail you have in your possession regarding Becker and the shills.

With that information you can digest the following PDF:

June-25-2015

Ashley begins lying from the jump on page two, the NIT has been adjudicated as hacking software, specifically malware. On page three she continues lying to every question per her own report (Authored for a conference in 2016 after her team helped railroad me). For example, her lies on page 3 are totally exposed by the objective truth revealed for the first time on page 4 of her 2016 report, where you’ll see the NIT was run in a hidden iframe (Figure 3) and the session_id was fake (Figure 4):

Shills-Final-NIT-Report

When you knowledgeably compare the two posted PDF’s you must agree that the conspiracy has been confirmed. Now I’m in a huge fight to get redacted pages un-redacted, pages withheld released & forcing Joe Howard to produce his conspiratorial e-mails!

bookmark_borderSCOTUS Approves – Show Me Your Papers!

Yet again, here is another example of the Supreme Court’s dangerous and cowardly use of the shadow docket (in the words of Jerry Nadler), this time they used it to authorize an American Gestapo.

As the linked article explains, Gestapos have these characteristics:

  • they’re a police force targeting political opponents and dissidents
  • they’re not controlled by other security agencies and answer directly to the dictator
  • the identity of their members and their operations are secret
  • they specialise in political intelligence and surveillance operations
  • they carry out arbitrary searches, arrests, interrogations, indefinite detentions, disappearances and torture.

ICE currently is exhibiting those characteristics, looks like Tim Walz was right…

bookmark_borderA Smoking Gun

Below is direct evidence of Collusion between Keith A. Becker and the Shills (Ashley Podhradsky, Matt Miller & Josh Stroschein). The FOIA dump is missing their May 2015 correspondence (I’m litigating) and probably others, but these pages prove that my experts were in direct “conspiratorial” contact with Becker a non-expert. I wonder what’s redacted, because most of the four pages are blacked out. LOL, typical government coverup/corruption. See for yourself:

Colluison

bookmark_borderWelcome to Police State USA

Eric A. Johnson has explained that: most Germans may not even have realized until very late in the war, if ever, that they were living in a vile dictatorship. In other words, ordinary Germans looked the other way when Jews were being rounded up and murdered. Therefore, they abetted one of the greatest crimes of the 20th century – not through active collaboration but through passivity, denial and indifference.

Now, much like 1930’s Germans, Americans have become passive, factionally polarized (and indifferent to those outside their faction) and willfully ignorant. “We” are increasingly distracted by entertainment, partisan politics and consuming media that doesn’t challenge our beliefs. Therefore, we are complicit in creating a police state similar to Nazi Germany.

bookmark_borderFOIA Update August 2025

The Court issued it’s ruling, the deadline has been moved to November 26, 2025… Typical! Now I await the Vaughn Index for their BS as to why they have withheld 3000+ pages and their BS “declaration” as to why they heavily redacted the 200+ released pages. Today I’m filing a motion to get those two things before the November deadline so that I can argue against everything they claim. For example, I’ll argue that all Exemption 7 claims are invalid do to them not meeting the foreseeable harm standard.

As you can see for yourself in the PDF below, they’ve redacted a lot of information, (under exemption 7 – shown in the documents as (b)(7)(*) – the * is whatever specific exemption 7 claim they’re making) that you can glean from other sources or other public documents thus it’s redacted illegally. As I pointed out previously, this FBI communication is a “smoking gun” because it declares that the Operation Started in 2011, NOT 2012 – thus the DOJ/FBI committed perjury many, many times regarding this specific operation. Removing all the Exemption 7 redactions will exonerate me.

FBI-Electronic-Communication

bookmark_borderAnother Analogy

So, my FOIA request has enabled me to draft another analogy about my prosecution. Here is what appears to have happened (succinctly):

In 2011, the Dutch National Police (DNP) illegally (in our country and theirs) hacked into websites and obtained identifying information about the users of those websites. The DNP and the DOJ didn’t know what to do with this illegally obtained information for a year until the DOJ/FBI devised a diabolical plan to “legally” re-obtain the DNP’s illegally obtained information in 2012. The illegally obtained information included IP Addresses and possible identities linked to those IP Addresses and what illegal information those IP Addresses accessed.

So, for the analogy, let’s substitute IP Addresses for physical street addresses and the names of the people associated with these addresses. And let’s substitute the information as boxes shipped via FEDEX to those physical addresses.

So, for example, let’s say that the DNP illegally determined that someone living at 123 Whatever Way in Wisconsin sent a package containing drugs to 456 Whatever Way in Nebraska in 2011. Let’s also say that the DNP notices that 123 sent a packages to 456 several times, thus establishing an illegal pattern of shipments.

The DOJ/FBI cannot use the DNP’s information to prosecute the actual people at 123 or 456 because none of the evidence will be admissible in Court, so they use “Parallel Construction” to prosecute the people at 123 & 456.

The problem with Parallel Construction is that it encourages government agents to fabricate evidence. For example, say 123 also ships legal products, like Pokemon cards. If the DOJ/FBI isn’t aware of that fact (or intentionally ignores it) many people 123 ships to will get swept up in their Parallel Construction dragnet.

Therefore, I now know that I was illegally swept up in their poorly executed dragnet; because, I have proven that they fabricated and falsified the evidence linking my IP address to TB2’s. So now I know why and how they did it. Now I just need the Eighth Circuit to agree…

bookmark_borderEpstein Thoughts

When you try and research his suicide, Google immediately thinks you’re researching it for yourself. LOL, once again proving how stupid A.I actually is, but I digress. As a person who had the unfortunate experience of being housed in a BOP SHU, I can assert that – under the normal SHU operating procedures that I personally experienced – it would be impossible to hang yourself in the SHU; because, there is nothing to hang from, or hang yourself with and therefore, I agree with this guy.

As I’ve noted before about conspiracies… it’s not inconceivable that a handful of people – operating on their own – with inadvertently aligned interests are capable of producing something that looks like a conspiracy; but, I believe that the probability that this could explain the actions of all the players involved in Epstein’s death is absolutely nil.

First we have two BOP guards who didn’t do what they were required to do. Not just neglecting their hourly rounds (and falsifying records stating that they went on their rounds); but, they also allowed Epstein to have entirely too much stuff in his cell. Just from the pictures (in the linked ABC article) I can see there was WAY too much stuff in that cell, specifically there are too many towels & sheets.

In the SHU each inmate gets one towel, one washcloth, one jumpsuit, one pair of boxers, one t-shirt, one sheet and one blanket. (Basically, you get one of everything you’re allowed to have). From that ABC picture you can see multiples of everything in that cell, that doesn’t happen without willful Guard malfeasance. When an inmate leaves the cell, he is required to wrap everything up in the sheet and bring it with him. In other words, there is no official way for all that stuff to be in the cell. (So that’s conspiracy point one).

Next, there is the fact that no-one has ever hanged themselves in a BOP SHU. (Note how no-one mentions that inconvenient fact.) Worse, the inept conspirators didn’t know that Adobe Premier would tell on them; Because, the RAW footage is missing 3 minutes. Note this footage is from the only camera that was working, while the other cameras were mysteriously NOT working (this is mysterious because unlike State prisons, BOP has adequate funding, so those cameras should have been working… So that’s conspiracy point two).

Note the not so mysterious death of Whitey. The official report’s claims are similar to Epstein’s:

  • BOP personnel did not adequately communicate and were confused about the transfer process.
  • BOP medical professionals did not adequately review Bulger’s medical records and failed to consider Bulger’s ongoing cardiac and other medical incidents when making decisions about his medical care level and transfer.
  • BOP officials did not accurately represent Bulger’s medical condition in BOP transfer paperwork.
  • The BOP did not timely update Bulger’s medical care level.
  • BOP Medical Care Level Guidelines were flawed and lacked clarity.
  • Due to BOP’s standard procedures, well over 100 BOP officials were made aware in advance of Bulger’s impending transfer to Hazelton.
  • BOP personnel spoke openly about Bulger’s upcoming arrival in the presence of Hazelton inmates, which was contrary to BOP policy and subjected Bulger, due to his history, to enhanced risk of imminent harm upon his arrival at Hazelton.
  • The steps taken by BOP personnel to assess whether Bulger faced harm from other inmates at Hazelton were lacking.

Replace Epstein’s suicide watch to Bulger’s heart condition and I think we have conspiracy point three. Like in baseball, three strikes and you’re out, IMO. Thus, we can speculate about what really happened. Like Bulger, the BOP allowed Epstein to die on purpose. Will we ever get the specifics? Probably not, but my guess is that those missing three minutes show someone entering and exiting Epstein’s cell block.