Month: September 2025

bookmark_borderThis is so bad…

Posted on

So in 2022 I tried to get the shills to answer questions. They refused and do not inform me of their 2016 report that contradicts their 2015 report. I do not find their 2016 report until 2023… So now I’ve proven that the shills were a part of Becker’s Conspiracy.

Now, I know that my lawyers were also a part of that conspiracy (instead of being confused by the shills lies). Their role included proffering the shills nonsense (that just confirmed the government’s lies) to the Court and coercing me to accept a conditional plea. Here are the events that lead up to my railroading: 

July 29, 2015: I view the evidence book with my Attorney, Mr. Howard and his “expert”, Mr. Kasel. I’m not impressed and order Mr. Howard to prepare for the Daubert hearing and trial. (If I won the Daubert hearing the case was over, if I lost the hearing we would proceed to trial, both scheduled for August 3, 2015.) I fly back to Rochester that evening and return to work the next day.

July 30, 2015 (8am to 4pm): Mr. Howard e-mails me all day, trying to get me to agree to allow him to negotiate a plea I’d enter into if we lost the Daubert hearing on August 3, 2015. I repeatedly order Mr. Howard to prepare for trial and that he did not have permission to negotiate any plea deal. He then tries to call me on the phone, I refuse to answer.

July 30, 2015 (4pm to 6pm): A little after 4pm, Mr. Slawinski e-mails me and asks if I would come to his office, I agree. Once there I’m ambushed by him, Mr. Howard and Mr. Gross to accept a “conditional plea” deal, that none of them had permission to negotiate. They coerce me into agreeing to the conditional plea by convincing me that it was like a “Nolo contendere” plea, when they knew that it wasn’t.

Now this recently disclosed passage from a previously posted e-mail chain confirms their participation in Becker’s conspiracy:

“I don’t want to drop it on him without one of us there… If he is in your presence, I think we may have more influence on him, and I think he needs the in person encouragement and advice.”

So he admits he will be “dropping” the plea agreement on me. That confirms he knows that I don’t know that it’s coming (because I repeatedly told him to prepare for trial). In the second sentence Howard admits he coerced me to take the plea because he knew I would reject the agreement unless they “encouraged” me to take it.

bookmark_borderOur POTUS Clown

Posted on

It’s rare for a federal court to order a Sua sponte dismissal of a lawsuit; But, that’s what just happened to our clown in chief. When informed of the dismissal during a press conference, our clown channeled Charlie Sheen and indicated that he was winning, when it was objectively clear that he was (IN FACT) LOSING!

Apparently, our clown lives in a bubble. Congress can and should stop this clown show; especially since it’s clear that most of the population (54%) disapproves of him as of July. That number is only going up from there, especially since Steven Miller is channeling Joseph Goebbels.

Apparently, 41% of the GOP are Nazi apologists (shockingly, so are 12% of Democrats & 20% of independents), which is a whole other problem; but thankfully no party harbors a majority of Nazis (check out the link, the results are troubling nevertheless).

As Walter Cronkite would say “…And that’s the way it is, September 23, 2025…”

bookmark_borderCertified Mail

Posted on

So I sent the following missive by Certified Mail to Joseph Howard Esq. (on September 19, 2025)

Dear Joe,
On August 21, 2025 I sent you the attached missive regarding e-mails in my case file and you ignored that missive. On September 4, 2025 I filed the attached complaint with your counsel for discipline.
Since you failed to comply with my previous limited request, I now formally request a complete copy of my file (a digital production is preferred – mailed to me on a Memory Stick if it is over 25MB, as that is the limit of e-mail attachments on my server) regarding Case No. 8:13CR108 including: all emails, electronic communications, correspondence, notes, drafts, memoranda, and any other documents or records relating to my case, whether exchanged with me, third parties, opposing counsels (especially Keith A. Becker) or internally with you team.
This request is made pursuant to Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 01-3, which clearly states that I’m entitled to the requested files. Therefore, please provide the requested files in digital format within 15 business days of the certified receipt of this letter.
Thank you for your prompt response to this certified letter.

And now I await a reply…

Update: USPS States: Your item was delivered to the front desk, reception area, or mail room at 1:38 pm on September 23, 2025 in OMAHA, NE 68102. Therefore, Joe’s response is due October 14, 2025.

bookmark_borderGoogle AI Thinks Joe Howard is Guilty

Posted on

Google’s AI says: An attorney who ignores a client’s demand to prepare for trial and instead negotiates a conditional plea agreement violates several American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct. The core violations stem from disregarding the client’s authority over the objectives of the representation, failing to communicate adequately, and failing to act with reasonable diligence.

Google’s AI also says: A defense attorney who allows a defense expert to lie in a report to the court violates several ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, primarily Rule 3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal. This rule prohibits knowingly offering false evidence and requires lawyers to take reasonable remedial measures, including disclosure to the court, upon discovering false evidence. The attorney also violates the general prohibition against dishonesty and misrepresentation, as well as the obligation to represent their client competently and diligently without engaging in fraudulent conduct.

Joe Howard is in possession of e-mails (or should be) from July 30, 2015 that tell him in no uncertain terms that he was not to negotiate a plea deal and instead prepare for trial (As the previous Post’s PDF alludes too).

I’m in possession of documents that prove Joe knew, or should have known the shill’s 2015 report was full of lies…

Got an e-mail into Megan E. Lutz-Priefert, hopefully she will respond so I can get her thoughts on this “new” information (she was my §2255 lawyer back in 2018).

bookmark_borderWhoop, There it is!

Posted on

During the day on July 30, 2015 Joe Howard was e-mailing me trying to persuade me to allow him to enter into plea negotiations with POS Becker. I denied all his requests in writing (via e-mails) ordering him to prepare for trial. As my previous post today explained, his disobeying my order violates many ABA rules. Thus, that’s likely why he won’t produce them.

It’s in that context that you can understand this brief selection of e-mails provided by the NY Public Defender’s office. While reading the second page of the pdf, keep in mind Howard knows he did not have permission to negotiate and obtain the “Petition to Plead Guilty” under discussion. Damning, No?

July-30-2015

bookmark_borderI Knew It

Posted on

I knew it but couldn’t prove it then (2015). See PDF:

I-knew-it

Shockingly, William Laubenheimer, died recently (RIP) so I can’t ask him to opine on the recent revelations. This is one instance where I think his demise was simple coincidence, thus the exception to my “rule” of not believing in coincidences. Regardless, with the limited information I had at the time (2015), I made a compelling argument that Ashely’s team was lying. As a consequence of Joe Howard’s refusal to comply with my e-mail demands, we can now conclude he was a part of Becker’s railroading conspiracy…

Let’s break it down. The NY Public defender’s office confirmed that I’m entitled to my case e-mails by complying with my request to turn them over (even though some e-mails appear to be missing, probably deleted on purpose — Whether that purpose was benevolent or nefarious will probably never be known).

Without knowing the exact mechanism of my railroading in 2015, the above pdf shows that I had a specific idea of what actually occurred when I declared that: “All these facts indicate that the visits never happened… or occurred inside a hidden iframe…”

When you google: “What ABA rules are violated when a defense attorney ignores his clients demand to prepare for trial and instead negotiates a conditional plea agreement?” Google will return a lengthly list of potential violations, thus explaining Joe Howard’s refusal to produce the requested e-mails. Especially since the chain of e-mails exchanged on July 30, 2015 prove he violated those ABA rules!

On September 4, 2025 I sent the Nebraska Counsel for Discipline a complaint about Howard’s failure to comply with my request for those incriminating e-mails. I await their reply…

bookmark_borderCode Explanation

Posted on

I realize that most of my readers may not understand the code shown in the shills 2016 report. Here is a brief breakdown. Figure 3 shows that gallery.php loaded with a query string. As the link explains a query string is a part of a URL that contains data and parameters to be passed to a web server. So as you can see in Figure 3, gallery.php is loaded with a query string setting parameters “b” to “girls” “t” to “1481” and “u” to /girls/res/1481.html” (the percent sign and the number two represent the /).

Now look at Figure 4, you’ll see $request_uri = isset($_GET[‘u’]) that code falsified the request_uri displayed on Figure 12. Now look at columns “request_uri” and “request_headers” (that fills the rest of the figure”). You’ll see the Referers are the same page as the request_uri. That occurs because the request_uri is falsified by the query strings!

In other words they (the FBI) were also falsifying the actual referring page! (The referring page is the page your browser was on before the current page: request_uri). See how that’s a HUGE problem? Your previous page could have been anywhere. For example, say you’re on a legal website using TOR, that sight could send you to TB2 in a hidden iframe without your knowledge. Then the above code would scrub that information from the table and make it look like you reloaded the page from a link on that page, for Figure 3, 1481.html.

Bottom line, this code is proof of fraud and criminal fabrication of evidence. Also note that I’ve been pointing out that Tinyboard doesn’t have a visitors table since June 2015, so all the government’s NIT evidence was inadmissible from the boot. The Shills knew that and helped Becker conceal it. Thus, I WAS RAILROADED!

bookmark_borderConspiracy Confirmed

Posted on

So, to my surprise, I received a large envelope on Friday September 12, 2025. This envelope contained the response to a letter I sent to the NY Public Defender’s Office On September 4, 2025 where I requested “all e-mails regarding [my case] between this office (e.g Steven Slawinski) and Joe Gross, Joe Howard, Gerry Grant, Ashley Podhradsky, Matt Miller, Josh Stroschein, Keith Becker & Michael Norris from April 2013 until December 2016.”

Not to my surprise, Joe Howard (my Nebraska Defense Counsel) has ignored a similar letter. Here are the relevant parts to give you context:

Beginning in May, the DOJ began releasing pages in response to my FOIA action. Some of those pages contain bombshell information never disclosed before. As you know, I refer to Ashley Podhradsky’s team as government shills; because, I knew that they were colluding with Becker to railroad me. Now, I finally have proof and that you were aware of this fact since June 2015.
As you can confirm from the attached pages, the shills were in direct contact with Becker, a non-expert, answering “questions posed by the FBI team” – WTF?
Anyway, as you know, direct communication is not allowed because Becker (or the FBI) could have (and apparently did) influence my experts to help railroad me. Peculiarly, their May 2015 communications with Becker were (intentionally?) omitted from the FOIA page dump. I eagerly await the Vaughn Index to see their justification for withholding them. I know they exist because the shills reference them in their misleading/false 2015 report – note that they totally impeached their 2015 report in 2016.
Regardless, since you clearly had the un-redacted version of the enclosed e-mails, I’d like to formally request that you send them to me (since they’re technically apart of my case file, so I’m entitled) and every other e-mail you have in your possession regarding Becker and the shills.

With that information you can digest the following PDF:

June-25-2015

Ashley begins lying from the jump on page two, the NIT has been adjudicated as hacking software, specifically malware. On page three she continues lying to every question per her own report (Authored for a conference in 2016 after her team helped railroad me). For example, her lies on page 3 are totally exposed by the objective truth revealed for the first time on page 4 of her 2016 report, where you’ll see the NIT was run in a hidden iframe (Figure 3) and the session_id was fake (Figure 4):

Shills-Final-NIT-Report

When you knowledgeably compare the two posted PDF’s you must agree that the conspiracy has been confirmed. Now I’m in a huge fight to get redacted pages un-redacted, pages withheld released & forcing Joe Howard to produce his conspiratorial e-mails!

bookmark_borderSCOTUS Approves – Show Me Your Papers!

Posted on

Yet again, here is another example of the Supreme Court’s dangerous and cowardly use of the shadow docket (in the words of Jerry Nadler), this time they used it to authorize an American Gestapo.

As the linked article explains, Gestapos have these characteristics:

  • they’re a police force targeting political opponents and dissidents
  • they’re not controlled by other security agencies and answer directly to the dictator
  • the identity of their members and their operations are secret
  • they specialise in political intelligence and surveillance operations
  • they carry out arbitrary searches, arrests, interrogations, indefinite detentions, disappearances and torture.

ICE currently is exhibiting those characteristics, looks like Tim Walz was right…